Elisabeth Hasselbeck Calls Sarah Palin Wardrobe Scandal Sexist
Ayman — October 28, 2008 — Social Good
References: thecaucus.blogs.nytimes & beat.bodoglife
Elisabeth Hasselbeck has attacked the scandal surrounding Sarah Palin’s extravagant $150K wardrobe and considered the negative attention “sexist”.
“Instead of the issues, they are focused, fixated on her wardrobe,” Elisabeth Hasselbeck said to loud cheers from the crowd as she introduced Sarah Palin. “Now, with everything going on in the world, seems a bit odd. But let me tell you, this is deliberately sexist. I know you know that.”
Elisabeth Hasselbeck further defended Sarah Palin the next day on The View by basically calling her a clueless fashionista, “She calls Jimmy Choos Johnny Choos. This is not a fashionista by any means. She’s not a clotheshorse. This is not even her property.”
In my view, the issue is valid and is surely not sexist. A candidate should be accountable for any unreasonably high spending regardless of their sex. The issue is even more obvious when we find out from the New York Times that the top salary of the John McCain presidential campaign during the first half of October went to Sarah Palin’s make-up stylist. When more money is spent on hair and makeup than on policy advisors and communications staffers, something is not quite right…
“Instead of the issues, they are focused, fixated on her wardrobe,” Elisabeth Hasselbeck said to loud cheers from the crowd as she introduced Sarah Palin. “Now, with everything going on in the world, seems a bit odd. But let me tell you, this is deliberately sexist. I know you know that.”
Elisabeth Hasselbeck further defended Sarah Palin the next day on The View by basically calling her a clueless fashionista, “She calls Jimmy Choos Johnny Choos. This is not a fashionista by any means. She’s not a clotheshorse. This is not even her property.”
In my view, the issue is valid and is surely not sexist. A candidate should be accountable for any unreasonably high spending regardless of their sex. The issue is even more obvious when we find out from the New York Times that the top salary of the John McCain presidential campaign during the first half of October went to Sarah Palin’s make-up stylist. When more money is spent on hair and makeup than on policy advisors and communications staffers, something is not quite right…
Trend Themes
1. Fashion Accountability - The trend of holding political candidates accountable for their fashion spending regardless of their gender presents an opportunity for companies to create more affordable and sustainable fashion options for politicians.
2. Gender-neutral Luxury - With the rise of gender-neutral fashion, luxury brands can create high-end clothing and accessories that don't rely on traditional gender roles and stereotypes.
3. Political Personal Branding - As political candidates continue to face scrutiny over their personal appearance, there is an opportunity for companies to provide branding and marketing services specifically tailored to the political arena.
Industry Implications
1. Fashion - The fashion industry can respond to the need for more accountable and sustainable options for politicians.
2. Luxury - Luxury brands can capitalize on the trend of gender-neutral fashion and create high-end clothing and accessories that cater to a wider audience.
3. Marketing and Branding - Marketing and branding firms can specialize in providing political candidates with personalized branding and image consulting services.
6.8
Score
Popularity
Activity
Freshness
